LONG ISLAND BULLETIN BOARD

Sachem Unspun - A site devoted to registered voters in the Sachem School District.
It is currently Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:26 am

All times are UTC + 5 hours [ DST ]




Post a reply
Username:
Subject:
Message body:
Enter your message here, it may contain no more than 60000 characters. 

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
Font size:
Font colour
Options:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode
Disable smilies
Do not automatically parse URLs
Anti-spam
Anti-spam:
Complete the task
   

Topic review - Board Positions
Author Message
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
Please tell me someone is running against that girl chasing egotistical punk.... d u n c a n t must go
Post Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:41 am
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
Fred I have been one of your suppoters over the years, but please continue to just stick with the numbers that you present to the community..The last comment about supporting RS is very disturbing my friend !!! What is wrong with just backing off, and not supporting either one of them!!! This guy played with all of us back then, and you know it better than anyone..Just dont get
what you are trying to prove.... :?

BOTH MEN HAVE CHANGED and I may not have time to get involved with just Sachem

Sachem School
Budget Vote is May 15th
No Vote = No New Taxes
Yes Vote = 10% Tax Increase

Smithtown School
Budget Vote is May 15th
No Vote = No New Taxes
Yes Vote = 7.5% Tax Increase

Valley Stream School
Budget Vote is May 15th
No Vote = No New Taxes
Yes Vote = 5% Tax Increase

Post Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:12 am
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
The school Board is a one Party system. Guess who really runs the schools. It doesn't matter who wins. The one big party will gobble them up!! Even if they start out like good guys.
Post Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:44 am
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
p
Post Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:43 am
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
Did Duncan report the contribution as he was required to do? And, Fred is now saying he would vote for the guy who was not only one of the nastiest ever on the board but also the lead advocate on the board for promoting an 18% increase. Fred is saying he had the wrong people around him? Give me a break. Richie was the wrong person who tried to strong arm other people on the board. Even if he was influenced by others, you would want such a weak minded person on the board? We have seen Fred's inconsistentcies before this is why he has lost all credability. Same pattern. He supports you than after the first budget vote he tells you he was betrayed. Time for Fred to retire.
Post Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:38 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
The biggest financial supporter of Duncan in the past was Gorman. He funded his last two campaigns. Duncan didn't report it and should have bee thrown off the board for that alone.


I gave Duncan $500 and through my support behind him. Back then I saw a honest passionate kid who loved his mother, special sister and Sachem. I never supported his second run. The Teachers did

I always liked S ayers as a person and felt he was in with a bad crowd of special interest. I sported the reconfiguration because of the tremendous educational, co-curricular ans sports opportunities that two school systems offered twice as many kids. If S ayers was reelected with Past Pres K the reconfiguration would have been dissolved.

If S ayers were to run against Duncan. I'd give him $500 and do all I could to get rid of the Sachem high school girl chasing influence selling self promoting creep Duncan has become.

Anyone can search this sight and get the scoop on either person.
Post Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:18 am
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
Don't underestimate dumbkin. He uses people during election time and makes big promises. It's amazing the amount of money he has for his election campaigns, yet declares nothing. He's. A wily llittle man.
Post Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:28 am
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
Guest wrote:
outsider wrote:
Guest wrote:
VOTE FOR RICH SAERS!


The community can't wait to vote for him lol...Not a chance here, but maybe in hell



If he runs against the Duncan he could win. The kid is up everyone's butt and uses the district for personal gain. Rich is the only Board Member not to profit from his service


anyone running against duncan will win
Post Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:01 am
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
outsider wrote:
Guest wrote:
VOTE FOR RICH SAERS!


The community can't wait to vote for him lol...Not a chance here, but maybe in hell



If he runs against the Duncan he could win. The kid is up everyone's butt and uses the district for personal gain. Rich is the only Board Member not to profit from his service
Post Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:47 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
Guest wrote:
VOTE FOR RICH SAERS!


The community can't wait to vote for him lol...Not a chance here, but maybe in hell
Post Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:12 am
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
VOTE FOR RICH SAERS!
Post Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 4:35 am
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
Richie and Mr K both whole heartedly supported the 18% increase. They said the district would be destroyed if it didn't happen. After it failed and the sky didn't fall Richie said it was the best thing that ever happened. The problem with Richie, besides his crude and vulgar temper, was that he saw the board and his role as being an advocate of anythine the Super and the Business manager asked for without question. They never took a real close look at the numbers. Mr. K saw his role as protecting the Super's budget. Richie saw his role as protecting The Super and Mr. K.
Post Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:21 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
Richie singlehandedly toolk on the corrupt powers in our district. He was the only one looking for justice with the construction projects. He alone challenges the construction managers, architects and district administrators. He was always left out to do the dirty work and he did it with his heart.
Post Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:04 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
[quote="Guest"]That wasn't Richie's fault. The administration blackmailed the public with the two Sachem concept. Richie fought for us and lost his battle with the PTA and teachers union. How do you think a 18 year old beat a tax paying businessman? The teachers union hates Richie! They hate Richie! Based on this fact Richie should run and the community should support him.[/quote

The above quote is so wrong its almost laughable..Rich was a VERY BIG PART OF THE 18% SACHEM BUDGET !!!!

Fact # 1 is he was not running for office that year and teamed up with Mr K to bring done others that were running, but got there butts kicked out of office the following year..
Fact # 2 is I personally called his autobody office and he admitted it over the phone to me...

Last thing we need is any one of these guys to try to run again, because people don't forget bottom line...
For the record I dont work for the district, and have no horses in the game as some may say..I am a taxpayer that was and still am pissed off about what these guys tried to do..
Post Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:03 am
  Post subject:  Re: Board Positions  Reply with quote
He and his partner supported the 18% to knock out the incumbents that were in office and up for re-election. :twisted:
Post Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:01 am

All times are UTC + 5 hours [ DST ]


Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group